Criminal Law

Miller v. Louisiana

At issue in Miller v. Louisiana is whether the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury requires that a criminal conviction be based on a unanimous jury verdict, and whether the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to recognize that right.

Case Summary

On September 4th, 2012, CAC filed an amicus curiae brief in the Supreme Court in support of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in Miller v. Louisiana.

In 2003, petitioner Corey Miller was convicted of murder in the second degree by a 10-2 jury vote. Louisiana is one of just two states that permit conviction by a non-unanimous jury. Miller, a recording artist, had been found guilty of the shooting death of a 16-year-old fan during an altercation outside a Baton Rouge nightclub.

CAC’s brief urges the Supreme Court to reaffirm that the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury requires that a criminal conviction be based on a unanimous jury verdict, and that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to recognize that right. The brief cites constitutional text and history on both points. Founders from John Adams to James Madison understood jury unanimity to be a bulwark of liberty, as essential to the jury trial right as the right to a jury of one’s neighbors and peers. The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment, which applied the guarantees of the Bill of Rights to the states, specifically mentioned the right to a jury trial as one of the fundamental rights newly protected against state infringement.

CAC emphasizes that the Court has already recognized the flaws of the current two-track system, which has required unanimity from federal juries but permitted states to obtain non-unanimous convictions. In 2010’s Second Amendment case, McDonald v. City of Chicago, the Court reaffirmed that the guarantees of the Bill of Rights bind the states and the federal government equally—there is no “watered-down” version of these rights that applies only in the states. Importantly, the Court also acknowledged that Apodaca v. Oregon, the deeply fractured ruling that led to the current two-track jury unanimity system, was an outlier case based on “an unusual division among the Justices.” CAC filed a brief in McDonald on behalf of prominent constitutional scholars from across the ideological spectrum, arguing that the individual right to bear arms was “incorporated” against state action by the Fourteenth Amendment, and supporting the robust incorporation of the Bill of Rights against the states.

On February 19, 2013, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in the case.

Case Timeline

More from Criminal Law

Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pitchford v. Cain

In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
Criminal Law
January 22, 2026

Supreme Court broadens police authority for warrantless home entry

Smart Cities Dive
The Case v. Montana decision replaces the Fourth Amendment’s “probable cause” requirement with “objective reasonableness”...
Criminal Law
January 20, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Unanimously Conclude that Restitution Under the MVRA Is a Criminal Penalty

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Ellingburg v. United States,...
By: Smita Ghosh
Criminal Law
January 14, 2026

Supreme Court Backs Police Entry Without Warrant in Emergencies

The New York Times
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said law enforcement officials had flexibility to enter a home...
Criminal Law
January 14, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Ignores History in Favor of Its Own Rule for Warrantless Home Entries

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Case v. Montana, a...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
November 11, 2025

Supreme Court to hear compassionate release case

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
[video width="1028" height="576" mp4="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Recording-2025-11-17-090534.mp4"][/video] WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - The Supreme Court is set to hear...