Health Care

Seven-Sky v. Holder

Seven-Sky v. Holder is another challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, this one brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by plaintiffs seeking a declaration that the Act’s minimum coverage provision is unconstitutional on its face and an injunction against its enforcement.

Case Summary

On February 22, 2011, the District Court granted the motion of the United States to dismiss, and the plaintiffs thereafter filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

On July 5, 2011, CAC filed an amicus curiae brief in the D.C. Circuit defending the constitutionality of the Act and urging affirmance of the District Court’s ruling. As in other cases involving the Act, our brief in Seven-Sky argues that, under the original meaning of both the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause, Congress acted within its constitutional authority in enacting the Act’s minimum coverage provision.

On November 8, 2011, a conservative panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Read our press release hailing the decision here.

For a detailed discussion of the constitutionality of the Act, please read (in addition to our legal briefs) our Issue Brief: The States, Health Care Reform, and the Constitution.

On June 29, 2012, the Supreme Court denied certiorari. For more information on the Supreme Court’s consideration of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, please go here.

Case Timeline

  • July 5, 2011

    CAC files amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

    D.C. Cir. Amicus Brief

More from Health Care

Health Care
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

California v. Trump

In California v. Trump, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can lawfully refuse to reimburse health care insurers for cost-sharing reductions as required by the...
Health Care
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

United States House of Representatives v. Price

In United States House of Representatives v. Price, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the executive branch acted lawfully when it reimbursed health care insurers for...
Health Care
September 14, 2015

A Federal Judge’s Decision Will Make Washington Even More Dysfunctional

The New Republic
The House lawsuit over Obamacare is going forward. Is the Iran deal next?
By: Simon Lazarus
Health Care
June 27, 2015

John Roberts to America: I’m in Charge Here

The New Republic
When, just over two years ago, right-wing superlawyer Michael Carvin filed his first lawsuit seeking...
By: Simon Lazarus
Health Care
June 21, 2015

Justice Anthony Kennedy Might Use a Conservative Principle to Save Obamacare

The New Republic
Here are the three most likely outcomes in the Supreme Court case
By: Simon Lazarus
Health Care
March 3, 2015

Why the ACA challenge violates federalism

Balkinization
Opponents of the Affordable Care Act have been caught off guard by the possibility that...
By: Simon Lazarus