Civil and Human Rights
A Progressive Approach to Constitutional Interpretation
By Marcia Coyle
Elizabeth Wydra likes to say the Constitution is her portfolio. For Wydra and her litigation team at the Constitutional Accountability Center, the U.S. Supreme Court has fattened that portfolio considerably in the current term….
More from Civil and Human Rights
June 15, 2025
Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
March 19, 2025
Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
February 27, 2025
What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Shilling v. Trump
In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
February 19, 2025
History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Talbott v. Trump
In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.