Rule of Law

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia this afternoon in National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, a case in which the court is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) are constitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center Equal Justice Works Fellow Anna Jessurun issued this reaction:

As the government conceded at oral argument today, the President cannot unilaterally shut down the CFPB without violating the Constitution. Citing CAC’s brief on behalf on current and former Members of Congress, counsel for the plaintiffs underscored that the power to create, restructure, and eliminate federal agencies is Congress’s power alone, and the President’s efforts to shutter the CFPB unlawfully intrude on Congress’s Article I powers and violate the Constitution’s bedrock principle of separation of powers. The D.C. Circuit should block the administration’s actions to shutter the agency and uphold Congress’s plenary power over the existence and structure of federal agencies.

CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod added this reaction:

Congress created the CFPB in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to protect America’s consumers and help ensure that another such crisis does not occur again. Its decision to do so is a quintessential example of Congress exercising its power over executive offices to provide for the welfare of the American people.

Since the CFPB was created, it has been remarkably successful at protecting America’s consumers. Indeed, without the CFPB, there would be no federal regulator charged with making sure that banks comply with the rules protecting consumers from deceptive practices. Shuttering the CFPB or reducing it in size to the point that it is incapable of fulfilling its statutory mandates would thus not only harm American consumers, but also would cause significant regulatory disruptions, undermining Congress’s plan in establishing the CFPB in the first place.

If President Trump wants to shut down the CFPB, the Constitution requires that he go to Congress and get it to give him the authority to do that. Notably, he has not done so.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 30, 2026

13th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court

Host: Constitutional Accountability Center
This year’s Home Stretch at the Supreme Court panel discussion will be moderated by Law...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Brianne J. Gorod, Easha Anand, Jennifer Bennett, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Chris Geidner, Melissa Murray
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.