Voting Rights and Democracy

CAC Release: The Continuing Assault on the Voting Rights Act Is Back at the Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Louisiana v. Callais on whether to reverse a district court decision that held unconstitutional the map the Louisiana legislature enacted to remedy a prior violation of the Voting Rights Act, Constitutional Accountability Center Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program David H. Gans issued the following reaction:

The Voting Rights Act is the nation’s most important civil rights law that helps safeguard the multiracial democracy our Constitution guarantees. In this morning’s argument, the Court’s conservative wing seemed poised to gut the Voting Rights Act’s nationwide prohibition on discriminatory results, repeatedly suggesting that any use of race to remedy a state’s racially discriminatory maps is unconstitutional and that there has to be a time limit on voting rights remedies. This idea that the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments—added to the Constitution to ensure that Black Americans would be full members of the body politic—bars legal remedies for racial vote dilution designed to cancel out Black voting strength turns the Constitution on its head.

The text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment give Congress broad powers to eradicate all forms of racial discrimination in voting, authorizing enforcement measures, such as the Voting Rights Act, to ensure that voters in communities of color have the equal right to elect representatives of their choice. The Framers of the Fifteenth Amendment understood that race mattered, and that made it critical to give Congress broad powers to squelch efforts to suppress or cancel out the votes of Black Americans. In this morning’s oral argument, the Court’s conservative Justices turned a blind eye to this core part of the Fifteenth Amendment’s text and history.

The Voting Rights Act was passed to vindicate the Fifteenth Amendment’s promise of a participatory democracy open to all regardless of race. The Court should honor the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment and reject the attack on the Voting Rights Act in Callais.

More from Voting Rights and Democracy

Voting Rights and Democracy
Wisconsin Supreme Court

Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

In Wisconsin Business Leaders for Democracy v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is considering the legality of Wisconsin’s congressional redistricting map.
Voting Rights and Democracy
July 8, 2026

“Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding” on the Election Law Blog

Election Law Blog
David Gans’s Slate article on the Roberts Court was featured on Election Law Blog. Read more.
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: Roberts Court Strikes Down Yet Another Campaign Finance Law, Turns Blind Eye to Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in National Republican Senatorial Committee...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rebukes Fifth Circuit, Affirms State Authority to Permit Post-Election Receipt of Mail Ballots

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Watson v. Republican National...
By: David H. Gans, Simon Chin
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 21, 2026

Guns, Weed, and the Forgotten Framers

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans discussed his forthcoming paper in the Stanford Law Review on the Black Conventions...
Voting Rights and Democracy
June 3, 2026

How Congress Can Pass a New Voting Rights Act Despite the Supreme Court

Slate
Director of the Human Rights, Civil Rights & Citizenship David H. Gans wrote an article in...
By: David H. Gans