Rule of Law

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6th attack on the Capitol, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

Despite promises that he would advance “law and order,” one of President Trump’s first acts in office was to pardon, and to commute sentences for, individuals convicted of offenses related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the United States Capitol. These pardons and commutations do nothing to improve the lives of everyday Americans, but instead undermine accountability for those who participated in a violent attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Trump’s actions today cannot erase the true facts of what happened on January 6th—facts developed through years of painstaking factfinding by nonpartisan and bipartisan governmental bodies, including the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol. The violence that day left countless law enforcement officers and workers injured, and it resulted in deaths; it was an assault on the will of the American voters and the rule of law. The American people will not forget.

##

Resources:

Praveen Fernandes & Donald K. Sherman, Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election, Salon.com (Sept. 8, 2024), https://www.salon.com/2024/09/08/justice-delayed-is-political-trumps-interference-case-must-continue-ahead-of-the/.

##
Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission

In Sripetch v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether a showing of pecuniary harm to investors is a prerequisite to an award of disgorgement in a civil action brought by the...
Rule of Law
April 30, 2026

13th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court

Host: Constitutional Accountability Center
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.