Access to Justice
Doctors Hope Justices Maintain Shield Against Med Mal Suits
CAC Kendall Fellow Michelle Berger discussed CAC’s amicus brief in T.M. v. University of Maryland with Law360. Michelle explains why this case has enormous implications for civil rights. Read more in Law360.
More from Access to Justice
June 23, 2026
CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
June 23, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
June 18, 2026
CAC Release: Court Further Muddies the Waters on the Scope of the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Majority Opinion that Ignores Critical Reconstruction-Era History Regarding the Role of Federal Courts as the Chief Guardians of Federal Rights
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in T.M. v. University of...
June 3, 2026
How to Get Neil Gorsuch to Stand Up For Workers
CAC Legal Fellow Harith Khawaja wrote an article for Slate magazine explaining how CAC's text...
May 28, 2026
CAC Release: A Victory for Text, History, and Delivery Workers in Flowers Foods v. Brock
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Flowers Foods v. Brock,...
April 28, 2026
CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...