Access to Justice
Doctors Hope Justices Maintain Shield Against Med Mal Suits
CAC Kendall Fellow Michelle Berger discussed CAC’s amicus brief in T.M. v. University of Maryland with Law360. Michelle explains why this case has enormous implications for civil rights. Read more in Law360.
More from Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court
Cisco Systems v. Doe
In Cisco Systems v. Doe, the Supreme Court is considering, among other questions, whether the Torture Victim Protection Act imposes liability on those who aid and abet torture.
March 25, 2026
CAC Release: Justices Should Respect History in Worker Arbitration Case
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Flowers Foods...
U.S. Supreme Court
Smith v. Kind
In Smith v. Kind, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether qualified immunity protects prison guards from being held accountable for constitutional violations after they confined an incarcerated person in a cell without...
March 4, 2026
CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects State-Affiliated Corporation’s Claim of Immunity from Suit
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Galette v. New Jersey...
February 25, 2026
CAC Release: In Disappointing Sixth Amendment Decision, the Supreme Court Made Clear the Limits of Its Decision
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Villarreal v. Texas, a...
February 12, 2026
February Newsletter: CAC Supports Everyday Americans Fighting for Their Day in Court
At every level of our judicial system, a complex set of doctrines determines what cases...