Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: In Latest Ruling, Conservative Justices Push Supreme Court’s Pro-Corporate Tilt Even Further

David Gans: “Today’s ruling is further proof that the Roberts Court is the most pro-corporate Court of the modern era.”

WASHINGTON—On news that the U.S. Supreme Court this morning issued its ruling in Jesner, et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC, Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief in the case in support of Jesner, issued the following reaction from CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans:

Today’s ruling is further proof that the Roberts Court is the most pro-corporate Court of the modern era. In yet another 5-4 ruling that bends the law to favor corporations, the Supreme Court held that corporations can never be sued under the Alien Tort Statute, rewriting the statute to allow corporations to commit human rights abuses with impunity. There is real irony in today’s decision. In recent years, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent noted, in cases such as Citizens United and Hobby Lobby, the Roberts Court has rewritten the Constitution and federal laws to give corporations the same rights as individuals. Today’s ruling gives corporations greater rights than individuals and makes it impossible to hold corporations accountable when they violate basic human rights norms.

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief in Jesner, et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/jesner-et-al-v-arab-bank-plc/

“Corporate Clout: As The Roberts Court Transforms, The Chamber Has Another Big Term,” July 26, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/corporate-clout/

“The Supreme Court’s New Term,” David Gans (discussing Jesner), September 29, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/the-supreme-courts-new-term/

“The Roberts Court Thinks Corporations Have More Rights Than You Do,” David Gans, The New Republic, June 30, 2014: https://newrepublic.com/article/118493/john-roberts-first-amendment-revolution-corporations

“A Capitalist Joker: The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past and Uncertain Future of Corporate Personhood in American Law,” CAC Text & History Narrative, March 20, 2010: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/a-capitalist-joker-corporations-corporate-personhood-and-the-constitution/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
October 4, 2024

An Oil Giant Railroads Its SCOTUS Connection To Gut Environmental Law

The Lever
A fossil fuel giant with deep ties to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, along with...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2024

QUICK TAKE: Corporate Interests at the Supreme Court, 2023-2024 Term

Conservative supermajority discards precedent, shifts power to judges, and hobbles agency efforts to enforce the...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 24, 2024

The Supreme Court’s War on Working People Just Got a Little Worse

Balls and Strikes
The decision in Starbucks Corporation v. McKinney is part of a long tradition of the Supreme Court...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 13, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Disappointing Decision in Starbucks Union Case Fails to Account for History

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney,...
By: Smita Ghosh