Rule of Law

Legion of Amicus Briefs Filed at SCOTUS to Contest IEEPA Tariffs

Twenty-seven amicus briefs were filed at the Supreme Court on Oct. 24 in opposition to the ability of President Donald Trump to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, bringing to 35 the total number of amicus briefs filed at the high court against the tariffs. The amici are a mix of law professors, current and former government officials, policy advocacy groups, economists and individual companies.

Jacob Kopnick mentioned CAC’s amicus brief in Learning Resources v. Trump in his recent article on amici in the Trump’s tariffs case:

Other briefs, such as the one filed by the Constitutional Accountability Center, centered on the history of wartime tariff power, whether that power existed and whether it was conferred to the president in IEEPA. One amicus, law professor Aditya Bamzai, argued that wartime powers have historically included the power to tax and that IEEPA should be read to include these powers (see 2509240056).
The Constitutional Accountability Center countered this claim by arguing that it “collapses under scrutiny.” The brief said when IEEPA’s predecessor, the Trading With the Enemy Act, was enacted in 1917, there was “fierce contestation” on the “existence or scope of an inherent presidential authority to impose tariffs during wartime.” And even if TWEA codified a wartime tariff power, history “makes clear that” IEEPA doesn’t confer that same power. “Congress’s bifurcation of IEEPA from the TWEA reflects a deliberate severing of peacetime emergency powers from their war powers origins,” the brief said.

Read the full article from International Trade Today, here.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
Rule of Law
February 4, 2026

‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota

Common Dreams
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
Rule of Law
January 29, 2026

We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights

TriplePundit
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
Rule of Law
January 30, 2026

CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Praveen Fernandes