Federal Courts and Nominations

Liberal Critics: Gorsuch’s Speaking Tour a Partisan ‘Victory Lap’

By Mark Swanson

Liberals are voicing their displeasure that new Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch’s recent and upcoming speaking events are nothing more than a glorified partisan “victory lap,” The Washington Post reported.

This week, Gorsuch will speak at a conservative legal scholarship gathering at the Trump Hotel in Washington, touching off a nerve with liberals who say it proves Gorsuch isn’t the independent jurist he passed himself off to be, the Post reported.

Thursday’s speech comes on the heels of Gorsuch’s travels across Kentucky with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, whose block of then President Barack Obama opened the door for Gorsuch on the High Court once President Donald Trump got elected.

“Whether or not this breaks any explicit ethics rules, it is certainly not the behavior you’d expect from someone trying to ensure the appearance and reality of judicial independence and impartiality,” Elizabeth Wydra, president of the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center, told the Post.

“Gorsuch traveling around with the Republican Senate majority leader in what seems to be a sort of victory lap appears disturbingly out of step with the (Chief Justice John Roberts’) sentiment” that there aren’t conservative or liberal jurists, Wydra told the Post.

All that is sour grapes cloaked in a desperate attempt to shade Gorsuch before his first full term even begins.

“Some critics seem to be indulging their own sensitivities rather than judging Justice Gorsuch by the same neutral rules that apply to other justices,” Edward Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told the Post.

Conservative jurists speak at conservative forums; liberal justices speak at liberal events.

“Is this any different from speeches and events Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg attends on a regular basis?” Jonathan Adler, a Case Western University law professor, told the Post.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche