Rule of Law

Lone Utah Democrat defends national health reform

BY KIRSTEN STEWART

A minority in her own minority party, Rep. Rebecca Chauvez-Houck was the lone Utah Democrat to sign a legal document in defense of President Barack Obama’s signature health overhaul.

More than 500 lawmakers from all 50 states signed a “friend-of-the-court” brief backing the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, which is being challenged by 26 states in a case now resting with the U.S. Supreme Court. The brief, filed Thursday, was prepared by the Progressive States Network and Constitutional Accountability Center.

“The majority of my constituents support the Affordable Care Act,” said Chavez-Houck, D-Salt Lake City. “It’s not a black and white issue. There’s work to be done to allow states some autonomy to partner with the federal government in implementing the law. … But I find it nerve-wracking that we continue to challenge its most basic elements.”

Federal health reform aims to virtually eliminate the nation’s ranks of uninsured through an expansion of Medicaid and a requirement that individuals buy health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a penalty.

It’s this core requirement, the insurance mandate, that 26 states, including Utah, challenged last year as unconstitutional. Their argument: Congress overstepped its authority to regulate interstate commerce by compelling people to purchase health coverage even if they want to pay their own expenses or don’t need medical care.

Democrats, in their legal brief, contend, “Congress has the power to regulate the nearly 20 percent of the U.S. economy that is the health care industry and when faced with a national health care crisis in which millions are uninsured and cannot afford decent health care.”

Chavez-Houck is one of 24 Democrats in the Utah legislature. None of Utah’s minority lawmakers responded on Thursday to calls for comment.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.