Access to Justice

Martin V. USA tackles wrong-house raid, government accountability

 

WASHINGTON (Gray DC) – The government’s argument Tuesday was that they shouldn’t have to pay for their error in raiding the wrong house because it comes with the territory of the job.

Both Liberal and conservative justices weren’t buying it.

“Checking the house number at the end of the driveway means exposing the agents to potential lines of fire” argued Federal Government lawyer Jeffrey Yuanlong Liu.

“How about making sure you’re on the right street?” responded Justice Neil Gorsuch.

Justices pushed back when lawyers for the government argued that the wrong-house mistake was par for the course.

“They didn’t want to delay the start of the execution of the warrants because they wanted to execute all the warrants simultaneously,” said Lui.

Lawyers on the side of the family say the trauma of the raid cost much more than the price of a kicked-down door.

“There’s this case itself is horrific,” said Miriam Becker-Cohen with the Constitutional Accountability Center.

“This innocent family was sleeping and the government banged on their door and came in. They set off a smoke grenade and, you know, terrified them.

They had a seven year old son at home,” said Becker-Cohen.

A decision in favor of the government could create more exceptions for mistakes like this one.

Becker-Cohen says victims may lose any sort of recourse.

There’s a chance that this decision gets kicked back down to the lower courts. Either way, we’ll know by June.

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corp. and New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Colt

In Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation and New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Colt, the Supreme Court is considering whether state-affiliated corporations have sovereign immunity.
Access to Justice
October 6, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Considers the Scope of a Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Villarreal v....
Access to Justice
June 12, 2025

CAC Release: In a Narrow, Unanimous Decision, Supreme Court Gives Victims of Wrong-House Raid Another Chance to Hold the Government Accountable

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Martin v. United States,...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Villarreal v. Texas

In Villarreal v. Texas, the Supreme Court is considering whether a defendant’s constitutional right to assistance of counsel is violated by a court order prohibiting the defendant and his counsel from discussing the defendant’s testimony...
Access to Justice
April 29, 2025

Supreme Court signals narrow path forward in mistaken FBI raid case

Washington Examiner
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to issue a narrow decision in the case of an...
Access to Justice
April 29, 2025

RELEASE: Supreme Court Seems Poised to Issue a Narrow Decision in Wrong-House Raid Case

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Martin v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Nargis Aslami