Civil and Human Rights

New Trump Muslim Travel Ban Suffers From Same Religious Discrimination As Old Trump Muslim Travel Ban

Washington, DC – After release of President Trump’s revised Muslim travel ban this afternoon – teased to the public days ago but only issued after coverage of Trump’s joint address to Congress had worked its way through the news cycle – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction: 

“Dressing up President Trump’s Muslim ban in more professional legal clothing does not detract from the fact that underneath it’s still a Muslim ban. Trump’s manifest, unconstitutional purpose is still live on his campaign web site, with an all-caps headline speaking loud and clear: ‘DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON PREVENTING MUSLIM IMMIGRATION.’ 
 
“Today’s announcement does nothing to fix that.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Darweesh v. Trump: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/darweesh-et-al-v-trump-et-al-edny 

“President Trump Expected to Sign Revised Travel Ban Sometime Next Week,” Elizabeth Wydra on FOX News Channel, February 23, 2017: http://theusconstitution.org/news/tv-fox-president-trump-expected-sign-revised-travel-ban-sometime-next-week

“Trump Travel Ban Suspension Upheld,” Elizabeth Wydra on the O’Reilly Factor, FOX News Channel, February 9, 2017: http://theusconstitution.org/news/tv-fox-trump-travel-ban-suspension-upheld

“DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON PREVENTING MUSLIM IMMIGRATION,” Trump-Pence Campaign, December 7, 2015: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2026

Leadership Conference Sign-on Letter Opposing Confirmation of Todd Blanche

Reject the Confirmation of Todd Blanche as U.S. Attorney General    The Honorable Chuck Grassley,...