Rule of Law

PODCAST (People For the American Way): The Progressive Happy Hour: A New Lawsuit on Trump’s Unconstitutional Foreign Emoluments

Since Donald Trump took office, his business dealings have raised serious legal and ethical questions about the conflicts of interest between his businesses and the American public.

In the June 22 episode of “The Progressive Happy Hour,” co-host Drew Courtney and PFAW’s senior director of outreach and public engagement Diallo Brooks sat down with Kristine Kippins, director of policy at the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), to discuss their lawsuit to hold Trump accountable for his violations of the foreign emoluments clause.

Kristine emphasized that the Constitution’s framers intentionally drafted the foreign emoluments provision to protect the American people from corruption by requiring Congress to affirmatively consent to the president accepting any benefits from foreign states. “Because [Trump] retained interest in the Trump organization, he is profiting from the presidency [by] selling real estate, receiving trademarks and regulatory benefits from foreign states all over the world where the Trump organization has an interest.” CAC represents 200 members of Congress for Trump having accepted foreign payments without their required consent; the organization is currently awaiting a decision from a federal judge on whether the parties have legal standing to proceed.

Kristine encouraged activists to hold the president accountable, and said, “Be active on social media with the hashag #NoOneAboveTheLaw. Tell your members of Congress how important this lawsuit is. And be vigilant about federal judicial nominations. This president has no regard for the law and the Republican congress has no interest in checking him, so courts are our last line of defense to be defenders of the rule of law. The future of the republic rests on a judiciary comprised only of fair-minded constitutionalists, and from what we’ve seen so far, we have reason to be nervous.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.