Civil and Human Rights
Prop. 8: Live chat at noon with constitutional expert [CAC’s David Gans]
By Rong-Gong Lin II
Join the Los Angeles Times for an interactive live Web chat with a constitutional expert on Tuesday’s Supreme Court hearing on Proposition 8.
The Times will be joined from Washington by David Gans, civil rights director of the Constitutional Accountability Project. Readers can submit questions live.
The Times’ David G. Savage and Noam N. Levey wrote earlier Tuesday that the Supreme Court justices sounded closely split on gay marriage Tuesday, but Justice Anthony M. Kennedy suggested the court should strike down California’s ban on same-sex marriage without ruling broadly on the issue.
More from Civil and Human Rights
May 19, 2025
Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
March 19, 2025
Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
February 27, 2025
What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Shilling v. Trump
In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
February 19, 2025
History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Talbott v. Trump
In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia considered whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.