Access to Justice

RELEASE: CAC Statement on Supreme Court’s unanimous New Prime decision interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act

“Today’s decision shows that even a business-friendly Supreme Court can be persuaded to rule for workers when presented with strong arguments rooted in text and history.”

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon learning of the Supreme Court’s unanimous 8-0 decision in New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira, the Constitutional Accountability Center’s (CAC) Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle said:

“Today’s decision shows that even a business-friendly Supreme Court can be persuaded to rule for workers when presented with strong arguments rooted in text and history. Corporate America urged the Court to interpret the Federal Arbitration Act in a way that would block many truck drivers and other transportation workers from seeking redress in court for their employers’ illegal behavior. But the Court unanimously rejected this effort to expand corporate immunity. CAC was gratified to see the how the opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, echoed the arguments made in our brief and drew upon the historical materials we cited in support of those arguments. The Court’s opinion, tracking the history presented in our brief, explains how the statutory terms in dispute here evolved to have different meanings today than they did when the FAA was enacted in 1925. What matters, as we argued and the Court confirmed, is what those words meant when Congress wrote the statute. And when properly understood in that way, the FAA’s language does not prevent workers like the plaintiff in this case from vindicating their rights in court.”

CAC filed its amicus brief with the Supreme Court on July 25, 2018 in support of Respondent Dominic Oliviera, the truck driver whose right to his day in court was being challenged by New Prime, Inc.

#

Resources:

Slate article on New Prime, Inc. v. Oliveira written by CAC’s Brianne Gorod and Brian Frazelle, published October 5, 2018: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/10/john-roberts-arbitration-truckers-new-prime.html

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org

###

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Smith v. Kind

In Smith v. Kind, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether qualified immunity protects prison guards from being held accountable for constitutional violations after they confined an incarcerated person in a cell without...
Access to Justice
March 4, 2026

CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects State-Affiliated Corporation’s Claim of Immunity from Suit

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Galette v. New Jersey...
By: Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: In Disappointing Sixth Amendment Decision, the Supreme Court Made Clear the Limits of Its Decision

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Villarreal v. Texas, a...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
February 12, 2026

February Newsletter: CAC Supports Everyday Americans Fighting for Their Day in Court

At every level of our judicial system, a complex set of doctrines determines what cases...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas

In United States ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Flowers Foods v. Brock

In Flowers Foods v. Brock, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Federal Arbitration Act exempts from arbitration “last-mile” delivery drivers who transport goods between two points in the same state to their final destinations,...