Rule of Law

RELEASE: Colorado Supreme Court Decision Represents a Win for Colorado Voters, Democracy, and Constitutional Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Colorado Supreme Court in Anderson v. Griswold, a case in which the Court considered whether Donald Trump should be allowed to appear as a candidate on the Colorado Republican Party presidential primary ballot due to his disqualification from office under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

Today’s decision by the Colorado Supreme Court affirms the district court’s careful findings that January 6th represented an insurrection and that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection, and it reverses the district court by holding—as the Constitutional Accountability Center urged in our amicus brief– that the Disqualification Clause applies to presidents and to the presidency.

Guided by the Constitution’s text and history, the Colorado Supreme Court held that because Donald Trump engaged in insurrection, he is constitutionally disqualified from serving as president and therefore should not be listed on the presidential primary ballot in Colorado.

Donald Trump might have violated the oath of office he took, but the Colorado Supreme Court Justices honored theirs. The Court did not shirk its “solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”

Today’s decision, driven by the facts and the law, represents a win for Colorado voters, democracy, and constitutional accountability.

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
Rule of Law
February 4, 2026

‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota

Common Dreams
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
Rule of Law
January 29, 2026

We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights

TriplePundit
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
Rule of Law
January 30, 2026

CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Praveen Fernandes