Rule of Law

RELEASE: If Trump Fires Mueller, “Potent” Grand Jury and Judge Remain

WASHINGTON—Constitutional Accountability Center today is releasing a new Issue Brief, The Russia Investigation: What Happens to the Grand Jury if Mueller Is Fired?, that explores the options available to the grand jury and Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell if President Donald J. Trump were to remove Special Counsel Robert Mueller III.

“For months, the country has looked on as President Trump flirts with firing Bob Mueller,” said CAC President Elizabeth Wydra, “and it is important that both President Trump and the American people know that the firing of Mueller will not necessarily end the important work that Mueller is doing. While there are limits to what the grand jury could do in the wake of Mueller’s filing, the judge and the grand jury could nonetheless take some actions that could be incredibly potent.”

This new Issue Brief, written by CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod and Appellate Counsel Ashwin Phatak, examines the history of the grand jury from the founding era to the present, comparing and contrasting the power that grand juries had in the past to that which they exercise today. It then discusses how the grand jury impaneled in the Mueller investigation by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell could, with the Chief Judge’s approval, produce a report of their findings even in the absence of Special Counsel Mueller. The Issue Brief then explores Judge Howell’s authority to release such a report in an appropriate manner, including perhaps to a committee of Congress.

“President Trump needs to know that he cannot fire the grand jury or the judge,” Wydra continued. “Before giving into his basest impulses and firing Mueller, President Trump would do well to remember that.”

#

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.