Access to Justice

RELEASE: In Torres, Important Victory for Access to Justice, Veteran Victim of “Burn Pits” 

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Roberts court has far too often closed courthouse doors to those seeking justice, but today’s decision is an important exception: it is a big win for Le Roy Torres, a victim of toxic burn pits during his Iraq deployment, and for other veterans in similar positions.

Today’s 5-4 ruling holds that returning veterans can sue a state to vindicate rights granted by Congress in the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, which protects veterans against employment discrimination on the basis of injuries they incurred in service. The majority ruled that Congress has broad powers to protect veterans under Article I’s war powers clauses, and that states waived their immunity to suits under laws authorized by the war powers when they ratified the Constitution.

As Justice Breyer’s opinion for the Court recognized, “Text, history, and precedent show that the States, in coming together to form a Union, agreed to sacrifice their sovereign immunity for the good of the common defense.” The majority’s opinion echoed the text and history laid out in CAC’s brief, which demonstrated that the Framers of the Constitution gave Congress strong powers to raise and support a military even at the expense of the states. Indeed, the Constitution’s framing was an explicit response to the Revolutionary War, which exposed the war-related shortcomings of government under the dysfunctional Articles of Confederation. The federal government’s dependence on the States, as the majority notes, “nearly cost the Nation victory in the Revolutionary War.” In what may prove to be Justice Breyer’s last, he delivered a resounding opinion that shows that the Constitution’s text and history gives Congress the power to protect the rights of veterans and empower them to sue states to vindicate their federal rights.

We are gratified by the Court’s ruling today and are incredibly pleased to have been part of helping Le Roy Torres win this important victory.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/torres-v-texas-department-of-public-safety/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Access to Justice

Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Smith v. Kind

In Smith v. Kind, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether qualified immunity protects prison guards from being held accountable for constitutional violations after they confined an incarcerated person in a cell without...
Access to Justice
March 4, 2026

CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects State-Affiliated Corporation’s Claim of Immunity from Suit

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Galette v. New Jersey...
By: Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: In Disappointing Sixth Amendment Decision, the Supreme Court Made Clear the Limits of Its Decision

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Villarreal v. Texas, a...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
February 12, 2026

February Newsletter: CAC Supports Everyday Americans Fighting for Their Day in Court

At every level of our judicial system, a complex set of doctrines determines what cases...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas

In United States ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Flowers Foods v. Brock

In Flowers Foods v. Brock, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Federal Arbitration Act exempts from arbitration “last-mile” delivery drivers who transport goods between two points in the same state to their final destinations,...