Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: Judge Jackson “Historic,” “Impressive,” “Overdue” Nominee for Supreme Court

“We have long known Judge Jackson to be a superb, fair-minded jurist. She has a powerful commitment to equal justice, repeatedly demonstrating her commitment to the text, history, and values of the whole Constitution. She understands how the law affects people, drawing upon her professional as well as her lived experiences.” — CAC President Elizabeth Wydra

WASHINGTON – On reports that President Biden will nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, following the announcement of Justice Stephen Breyer’s forthcoming retirement, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

This nomination is historic and long overdue.

For generations, America has produced brilliant Black women attorneys and judges exceptionally qualified to serve on the Supreme Court. Yet for 230 years—with 115 justices serving over that period—no Black woman was even nominated, much less confirmed, to the High Court. Today, President Biden took a momentous step to remedy that glaring error by drawing from a deep bench of attorneys with stellar credentials, nominating Judge Jackson, a deeply impressive choice.

We have long known Judge Jackson to be a superb, fair-minded jurist. She has a powerful commitment to equal justice, repeatedly demonstrating her commitment to the text, history, and values of the whole Constitution. She understands how the law affects people, drawing upon her professional as well as her lived experiences.

It is also worth noting, Judge Jackson has nearly nine years’ experience in her service on the U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, almost twice as much pre-Supreme Court bench experience as Justices Barrett, Kagan, and Thomas put together. And by the end of next month, Judge Jackson will have over 2 years more pre-Supreme Court bench experience than Justices Barrett, Kagan, Thomas, and Chief Justice Roberts combined.

We congratulate both President Biden on making this momentous choice, and Judge Jackson for making history. We enthusiastically support her nomination and look forward to her prompt consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee and confirmation by the full Senate.

#

Resources:

* CAC Letter to Full Senate in Support of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination to D.C. Circuit, June 9, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/testimony/cac-letter-to-full-senate-in-support-of-judge-ketanji-brown-jacksons-nomination-to-d-c-circuit/

* CAC Letter In Support of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Nomination to D.C. Circuit, May 19, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/testimony/cac-letter-in-support-of-judge-ketanji-brown-jacksons-nomination-to-d-c-circuit/

* Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson received her commission to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 26, 2013. She received her commission to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on June 17, 2021. March 26, 2022 would mark 9 years—3288 days—of total bench experience between U.S. District Court and D.C. Circuit service. That means Judge Jackson has nearly twice as much pre-Supreme Court bench experience as Justices Barrett, Kagan, and Thomas put together. [3288 days vs. 1681 days] Including Chief Justice Roberts, Judge Jackson would have 756 days, or more than 2 years, pre-Supreme Court bench experience than four sitting justices. [3288 days vs. 2532 days]

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche