Rule of Law
RELEASE: Supreme Court Will Review Denial of Trump’s Request for Absolute Presidential Immunity, Further Delaying Criminal Proceedings Against Him
WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision regarding Donald Trump’s request to stay the criminal proceedings against him pending further review of the D.C. Circuit’s decision that Trump is not immune from criminal prosecution for crimes committed while in office, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh issued the following reaction:
Last month, the D.C. Circuit unanimously rejected former President Trump’s claim of absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court has now decided to hear his appeal of that decision in April, which will keep the criminal proceedings against him on hold for at least several months.Today’s decision, which comes over two weeks after Trump’s request, makes clear that the Court does not take seriously the need for prompt resolution of this dispute. In previous cases involving time-sensitive political issues—including Bush v. Gore—the Court demonstrated that it can act quickly when circumstances demand it. It should be doing the same here.Significantly, though, the Court’s decision has no bearing on how the Court will resolve Trump’s claim on the merits, as the Court’s order made clear. Given the clear case against Trump’s unprecedented claim for absolute immunity, which has already been denied by two courts, the Supreme Court should rule against Trump—and it should do so as quickly as possible.
##
Resources:
Case page in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/
Smita Ghosh, The Founding Fathers Didn’t Think Donald Trump Should Get Immunity Either, Newsweek: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/the-founding-fathers-didnt-think-donald-trump-should-get-immunity-either-opinion/
##
Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.
##
More from Rule of Law
December 11, 2025
Not Above the Law Coalition Demands Accountability: Trump’s Illegal National Guard Deployments Threaten Democracy
WASHINGTON - As the Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Trump administration’s deployment...
December 15, 2025
The Framers Warned Us About the Dangers of Corruption
December 11, 2025We Seem to Have the Supreme Court’s Originalism Fail of the Term
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard argument in a case that could upend how the...
December 8, 2025
CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
U.S. Supreme Court
Pung v. Isabella County
In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
December 15, 2025
Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...