Rule of Law

RELEASE: Trump’s Firing of National Labor Relations Board Member Without Good Cause Is Blatantly Unconstitutional

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has fired National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Member Gwynne Wilcox without good cause, Constitutional Accountability Center Deputy Chief Counsel Brian Frazelle issued the following reaction:

Supreme Court precedent makes clear that Congress can shield the leaders of multimember expert boards like the NLRB from being fired except for good cause. Indeed, that kind of good-cause tenure protection goes back to the nineteenth century and has consistently been affirmed by the Supreme Court for almost 100 years. Only recently, federal courts, including the very conservative Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, have agreed that Congress may protect the leaders of agencies like the NLRB from being fired at will. President Trump’s firing of an NLRB Member without good cause flies in the face of that precedent and practice and is blatantly unconstitutional.

Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod added:

In purporting to fire an NLRB Member without good cause, President Trump has shown, yet again, his utter contempt for the rule of law and Supreme Court precedent. And it will, yet again, be up to the courts to uphold the rule of law and make clear that President Trump must abide by the rules set by our Constitution and federal law. The ability of the Board to do its important work on behalf of America’s workers depends on it.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...