Rule of Law

RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision in Animal Welfare Case Is Important Victory for Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, in which the Supreme Court upheld the legality of California’s animal welfare law, Proposition 12, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Senior Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle had this reaction:

Today’s decision is not just a victory for the animals that many pork companies confine in tiny cages, it is a victory for democracy itself, rejecting an aggressive corporate effort to conscript the courts in overruling the will of the voters.

While states may not pass laws that discriminate against products from other states, the Court made clear that a state’s health and safety regulations do not become unconstitutional simply because out-of-state companies may have to spend money obeying those laws in order to sell products within the state. Justice Gorsuch’s opinion also firmly rejected the idea that judges may strike down a state’s consumer protection laws “based on nothing more than their own assessment of the relevant law’s costs and benefits.”

Embracing the arguments presented in our amicus brief for law professors Barry Friedman and Daniel Deacon, the opinion stresses that the so-called “dormant Commerce Clause,” on which the pork producers based their lawsuit, is fundamentally about preventing state economic protectionism. It does not give judges a license “to reassess the wisdom of state legislation.” Policy choices like these instead “belong to the people and their elected representatives.”

##

Resources:

Amici curiae brief in Ross v. National Pork Producers Council: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/national-pork-producers-council-v-ross/

Brian R. Frazelle, The Supreme Court’s Ruling on California’s Pig Crate Law Could Be a Gift to Corporate America, The New Republic, https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-californias-pig-crate-law-could-be-a-gift-to-corporate-america/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.