Civil and Human Rights

Second Founders

At a time when this ideology that calls itself “constitutional conservatism” demands that we all confine our imaginations of how American government should function to the Founders’ intentions (with a little retroactive Christian Nationalism minus the entrenchment of slavery), it’s important to remember that in response to the trauma of the Civil War, there was a “second founding” encompassed by the Civil War amendments and the effort towards Reconstruction that really must be understood as well.

At a time when this ideology that calls itself “constitutional conservatism” demands that we all confine our imaginations of how American government should function to the Founders’ intentions (with a little retroactive Christian Nationalism minus the entrenchment of slavery), it’s important to remember that in response to the trauma of the Civil War, there was a “second founding” encompassed by the Civil War amendments and the effort towards Reconstruction that really must be understood as well.

With perfect timing, Jeffery Rosen of the National Constitutional Center and Tom Donnelly of the Constitutional Accountability Center are announcing a Second Founding Initiative that will undertake a five-year discussion to commemorate the 150th anniversaries of the key moments of those crucial years.

While the American people rightly revere George Washington, James Madison, and their fellow Framers, it took the heroic efforts of Lincoln, Stevens, Frederick Douglass, John Bingham (the framer of the Fourteenth Amendment), and many others to create the “more perfect Union” built on winning a bloody Civil War and ratifying a series of amendments that ended slavery, protected fundamental rights from state abuses, guaranteed equality for all, and expanded the right to vote. While the 1787 Framers succeeded in creating the most durable form of government in history, it’s only after the Second Founding that the Constitution fully protected the liberty and equality promised in the Declaration of Independence….

In light of the Second Founding turning 150, the time is ripe for a national conversation about its enduring meaning and continuing importance. Of course, few Americans have likely thought about this period (or its leaders) since their high school history classes—and, even then, they are as likely to remember Reconstruction as a period of Northern vengeance and national disappointment as they are a precursor to Brown v. Board of Education, King, and the achievements of the civil-rights movement….

Over the next five years, the National Constitution Center and Constitutional Accountability Center will work together on the Second Founding Initiative, with an advisory board chaired by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. The bi-partisan initiative is committed to bringing together scholars, thought leaders, and citizens from diverse philosophical and legal perspectives to commemorate and debate the meaning of the Second Founding, the original understanding of the Reconstruction Amendments, and their contemporary significance.

This couldn’t come a moment too soon. Many of us were shocked and delighted when a conservative presidential candidate offered a shout-out to the Fourteenth Amendment as an important Republican accomplishment back in July. But Rick Perry has since dropped out of the race, and the constitutional conservatives who have a tendency to wish away all the unpleasantness of the 1860s (except, of course, when they are looking for an alleged precedent for the movement to recriminalize abortion) are again riding high. Remembering the Second Founders and their determination to keep America from perpetually being a stunted and internally riven eighteenth century agrarian slave-owning oligarchy is an urgent educational—and political—undertaking.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Civil and Human Rights
November 20, 2025

Supreme Court Could Redefine the Limits of State Power

Newsweek
As the Supreme Court considers Chiles v. Salazar, a case examining Colorado’s 2019 ban on gay conversion therapy...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J.

In Little v. Hecox and West Virginia v. B.P.J., the Supreme Court is considering whether laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit all transgender women and girls from joining women’s and girls’ sports teams—across...
Civil and Human Rights
November 9, 2025

Supreme Court to hear case on religious rights in prison

Deseret News
Oral arguments on Monday in Landor v. Louisiana will focus on religious liberties while incarcerated.
Civil and Human Rights
November 10, 2025

CAC Release: In Landor Case, Question of Whether Person in Prison Who Suffered Undisputed Religious Liberty Violation Has Any Meaningful Remedy Hangs in the Balance

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Landor v....
Civil and Human Rights
October 7, 2025

Supreme Court Appears Poised to Strike Down Ban on Anti-LGBTQ ‘Conversion Therapy’

The New Civil Rights Movement
The U.S. Supreme Court appears poised to strike down a Colorado ban on so-called conversion...