Rule of Law

Trump’s current term cannot be extended by three years

“This is absolutely, 100 percent wrong. The Supreme Court cannot in any way, under any circumstances or for any reason, grant any president any sort of ‘extension’ of their term in office.” — CAC President Elizabeth Wydra

Facebook posts shared more than 4,000 times link to an article stating that President Donald Trump’s current term could be extended by three years, with some users apparently taking it as fact. The claim is false; the article is labeled satire, and legal experts say it cannot happen.

The article — linked to in posts here and here — is headlined: “Supreme Court Can Extend Trump’s Term By Up To 3 Years If He’s Acquitted In The Senate.”

“Is this possible?” one of the posts on a pro-Trump Facebook page says.

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Comments on the post indicate that some readers believe it is in fact possible, though others identified the article as satire.

“Now this is great news!” wrote one person, while another commented: “Fabulous. I would be happy if he remained President indefinitely.”

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

The article says that if Trump is acquitted by the Senate — where he is currently on trial on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — his term could be extended until 2023 unless the top US court struck down a 1970s-era law allowing this to happen.

It was published on dailyworldupdate.us, a website whose banner says the site provides “Satire for Flat Earthers, Trumpsters, and Y’all Qaeda.”

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Dailyworldupdate.us is part of the “America’s Last Line of Defense” network of websites, which was founded by Christopher Blair, a resident of the US state of Maine.

Articles on Blair’s sites make outrageous claims written as fact, albeit with clear indications they are not real.

The articles are nonetheless shared in droves by people who apparently believe they are true amid a hyper-partisan American political environment.

Legal experts also told AFP by email that Trump’s current term cannot be extended.

“This is absolutely, 100 percent wrong. The Supreme Court cannot in any way, under any circumstances or for any reason, grant any president any sort of ‘extension’ of their term in office,” said Elizabeth Wydra, the president of the Constitutional Accountability Center.

It “is categorically untrue and there is no basis in the text or interpretive history of the Constitution to support that claim,” said Fernando Laguarda, Director of the Program on Law & Government at American University’s Washington College of Law.

The US president has repeatedly joked about remaining in office past the constitutionally-mandated two-term limit during campaign rallies and official speeches, as well as on Twitter.

A screenshot taken on February 4, 2020

Claims that Trump’s acquittal by the Senate would nullify his first term and allow him to serve two more have also circulated online in recent months, including here and here.

But legal experts said the only way Trump could stand for more than two terms would be through an amendment to the Constitution.

“The Constitution forbids any person to be elected more than twice to the office of president. Frankly, it’s deeply worrisome that some Trump supporters are even contemplating such an unconstitutional, anti-democratic, un-American idea,” Wydra said.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.