ISSUE BRIEF: Will Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Be A Reliable Vote for Big Business?

An analysis of Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench.

Summary

This Issue Brief analyzes Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench. This Brief highlights a few of Judge Barrett’s most troubling opinions in several different issue areas: discrimination in the workplace, access to justice, and arbitration. Across these different issue areas, a common theme emerges: Judge Barrett routinely sides with corporations and employers over consumers and employees. As Accountable.US recently documented, throughout her tenure as a judge on the Seventh Circuit, Judge Barrett has sided with corporations more than 76% of the time.[1] Based on this record, there is significant reason to worry that Judge Barrett, if she is confirmed, will continue the Roberts Court’s trend toward improperly favoring the interests of big businesses over all Americans. This is particularly concerning given that she has been nominated to take the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who knew all too well the ways that corporations could use their power to discriminate against employees, limit access to justice, and avoid accountability for harm to consumers and workers.

[1] Press Release, Accountable.US, Report: Coney Barrett Sided with Corporations Over People 76% of the Time (Sept. 29, 2020), https://www.accountable.us/news/report-coney-barrett-sided-with-corporations-over-people-76-of-the-time/.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
August 27, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Responds to SCOTUS Eviction Moratorium Decision and Troubling Shadow Docket

WASHINGTON – Following the Supreme Court’s decision to end the pandemic-related residential eviction moratorium, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 30, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Commends Lower Court Judgeship Bills

WASHINGTON – On today’s news that Congressman Hank Johnson, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2021

Analysis: U.S. Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ favored religion and Trump

Reuters
WASHINGTON, July 28 (Reuters) - As midnight approached on the eve of the U.S. Thanksgiving...
By: David H. Gans, By Lawrence Hurley, Andrew Chung
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2021

OP-ED: From Qualified Immunity to Voting Rights, the Supreme Court Guts Civil Rights Laws

The American Prospect
The Court’s right-wingers elevate the rights of government officials over those it is constitutionally required...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 12, 2021

Steady term of the Supreme Court ends with politically fraught cases that reveal divisions

USA Today
WASHINGTON – For months, the Supreme Court appeared to rise above partisan strife – becoming a place where...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By John Fritze
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2021

Post-Trump supreme court appears willing to embrace judicial activism

The Guardian
Court issued some near-unanimous decisions this term, but one legal expert suspects rightwing justices are...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Ed Pilkington