ISSUE BRIEF: Will Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Be A Reliable Vote for Big Business?

An analysis of Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench.

Summary

This Issue Brief analyzes Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench. This Brief highlights a few of Judge Barrett’s most troubling opinions in several different issue areas: discrimination in the workplace, access to justice, and arbitration. Across these different issue areas, a common theme emerges: Judge Barrett routinely sides with corporations and employers over consumers and employees. As Accountable.US recently documented, throughout her tenure as a judge on the Seventh Circuit, Judge Barrett has sided with corporations more than 76% of the time.[1] Based on this record, there is significant reason to worry that Judge Barrett, if she is confirmed, will continue the Roberts Court’s trend toward improperly favoring the interests of big businesses over all Americans. This is particularly concerning given that she has been nominated to take the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who knew all too well the ways that corporations could use their power to discriminate against employees, limit access to justice, and avoid accountability for harm to consumers and workers.

[1] Press Release, Accountable.US, Report: Coney Barrett Sided with Corporations Over People 76% of the Time (Sept. 29, 2020), https://www.accountable.us/news/report-coney-barrett-sided-with-corporations-over-people-76-of-the-time/.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
June 5, 2021

TV (FOX): Supreme Court to issue rulings on 23 more cases, including free speech, health care

Fox News Channel
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2021

Court watchers buzz about Breyer’s possible retirement

The Hill
The possibility of Justice Stephen Breyer’s imminent retirement is hanging over the Supreme Court as the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By John Kruzel
Federal Courts and Nominations
April 23, 2021

Originalism Watch, Sixth Circuit Edition: Judge Bush Denigrates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Protection of Fundamental Rights

The federal courts, from the Supreme Court on down, are packed with conservative jurists who claim to be faithful...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
April 11, 2021

‘A delay tactic’: Biden’s Supreme Court commission called move to placate left wing

The Washington Times
Ben Sasse said the president knows his court-packing commission isn’t going anywhere
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Alex Swoyer and David Sherfinski
Federal Courts and Nominations
April 14, 2021

OP-ED: Recent Attacks on Voting Rights Underscore the Need for a Black Woman Supreme Court Justice

The Washington Informer
With voting rights under attack, we need Supreme Court justices who will follow the clear...
By: Kristine A. Kippins
Federal Courts and Nominations
April 14, 2021

RELEASE: DOJ Nominee Kristen Clarke Demonstrates She Is Exactly What the Civil Rights Division Needs in Senate Judiciary Committee Confirmation Hearing 

WASHINGTON – Following a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee on the nomination of Kristen Clarke to be Assistant Attorney General of...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra