ISSUE BRIEF: Will Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Be A Reliable Vote for Big Business?

An analysis of Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench.

Summary

This Issue Brief analyzes Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench. This Brief highlights a few of Judge Barrett’s most troubling opinions in several different issue areas: discrimination in the workplace, access to justice, and arbitration. Across these different issue areas, a common theme emerges: Judge Barrett routinely sides with corporations and employers over consumers and employees. As Accountable.US recently documented, throughout her tenure as a judge on the Seventh Circuit, Judge Barrett has sided with corporations more than 76% of the time.[1] Based on this record, there is significant reason to worry that Judge Barrett, if she is confirmed, will continue the Roberts Court’s trend toward improperly favoring the interests of big businesses over all Americans. This is particularly concerning given that she has been nominated to take the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who knew all too well the ways that corporations could use their power to discriminate against employees, limit access to justice, and avoid accountability for harm to consumers and workers.

[1] Press Release, Accountable.US, Report: Coney Barrett Sided with Corporations Over People 76% of the Time (Sept. 29, 2020), https://www.accountable.us/news/report-coney-barrett-sided-with-corporations-over-people-76-of-the-time/.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
August 6, 2022

Scalia’s Legacy Lives on in Supreme Court’s Abortion, Gun Cases

Bloomberg
The seeds of the US Supreme Court’s recent rulings on guns and abortion lie in...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Greg Stohr
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2022

How the Supreme Court’s “fauxriginalists” are warping the Constitution

Salon
...The truth is that so-called modern originalists or textualists, like the late Justice Antonin Scalia...
By: Praveen Fernandes, By Kirk Swearingen
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 13, 2022

Thomas didn’t mention interracial marriage, and that’s worth talking about

Courthouse News Service
WASHINGTON (CN) — Before the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority struck it off the books last...
By: David H. Gans, Kelsey Reichmann
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2022

Progressive Groups Pressure Democrats to Move Faster on Judicial Vacancies

National Law Journal
...And progressive groups are raising alarm bells over the pace at which the Biden administration...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Avalaon Zoppo
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2022

RADIO (BBC): How the Supreme Court is reshaping the US

BBC Radio