ISSUE BRIEF: Will Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Be A Reliable Vote for Big Business?

An analysis of Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench.

Summary

This Issue Brief analyzes Judge Barrett’s jurisprudence on issues relevant to corporate interests on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, the court on which Judge Barrett has sat for the entirety of her three years on the federal bench. This Brief highlights a few of Judge Barrett’s most troubling opinions in several different issue areas: discrimination in the workplace, access to justice, and arbitration. Across these different issue areas, a common theme emerges: Judge Barrett routinely sides with corporations and employers over consumers and employees. As Accountable.US recently documented, throughout her tenure as a judge on the Seventh Circuit, Judge Barrett has sided with corporations more than 76% of the time.[1] Based on this record, there is significant reason to worry that Judge Barrett, if she is confirmed, will continue the Roberts Court’s trend toward improperly favoring the interests of big businesses over all Americans. This is particularly concerning given that she has been nominated to take the seat of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who knew all too well the ways that corporations could use their power to discriminate against employees, limit access to justice, and avoid accountability for harm to consumers and workers.

[1] Press Release, Accountable.US, Report: Coney Barrett Sided with Corporations Over People 76% of the Time (Sept. 29, 2020), https://www.accountable.us/news/report-coney-barrett-sided-with-corporations-over-people-76-of-the-time/.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
April 9, 2021

RELEASE: As Supreme Court Commission Studies Court Reform, Biden Administration Should Broadly Commit to Improving Access to Justice

WASHINGTON – On the White House today announcing the formation of a commission to study potential Supreme Court reform measures,...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 30, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Welcomes Biden Federal Court Nominations 

WASHINGTON – On President Biden’s nomination of eleven nominees to vacancies on the federal courts, including Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the U.S. Court of...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 26, 2021

Biden agenda could collide with federal judiciary remade by Trump

CBS News
Washington — Former President Trump's reshaping of the federal judiciary is likely to be a legacy felt...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Melissa Quinn
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 19, 2021

OP-ED: Will Biden nominate a solicitor general to meet this historic moment?

Roll Call
President can draw inspiration from Benjamin Bristow and Thurgood Marshall
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
March 18, 2021

The Judicial Conference Rightly Continues to Request Additional Judgeships

Earlier this week, the Judicial Conference of the United States – the official, nonpartisan, policy-making body of the...
By: Becca Damante
Federal Courts and Nominations
February 24, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Supports Confirmation of Merrick Garland as Attorney General 

WASHINGTON – Following confirmation hearings on the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to be the 78th Attorney...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra