Material Harm to Our System of Justice

This Supreme Court Term marks the first Term in decades in which the Court will be without a full complement of nine Justices for almost half the Term. This analysis, produced by Constitutional Accountability Center and People for the American Way Foundation, reviews the harmful effects of the continuing vacancy on the Court, both in the current Term and the upcoming Term as well as in historical context.

Summary

This Supreme Court Term marks the first Term in decades in which the Court will be without a full complement of nine Justices for almost half the Term. The eight Justices now on the Court have said little about the effects of the prolonged vacancy on the Court following the death of Justice Scalia in February, other than stating that their work will go forward and “[f]or the most part” would not change. In fact, the Court decides most of its cases with three or fewer dissenting votes, and work on such cases can proceed without disruption.

In the years since World War II, however, an increasing number of important legal controversies have closely divided the Supreme Court and have been resolved by 5-4 rulings. When, as is currently the case, only eight Justices sit on the Court, it is possible for the Court to deadlock. Such 4-4 ties leave the lower court decision in place, but set no national precedent. Already since Justice Scalia’s death, as discussed below, two important legal controversies have resulted in 4-4 votes, and in one of those cases, the result is that different legal rules apply to different people and businesses in states literally right next to each other.

This analysis reviews the harmful effects of the continuing vacancy on the Court, both in the current Term and the upcoming Term as well as in historical context.

Produced by Constitutional Accountability Center and People for the American Way Foundation.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

RADIO/PODCAST (Bloomberg): Scalia’s Legacy Lives On As Court Transforms Law

Bloomberg Law
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 9, 2022

Friends of the Court

National Law Journal (Supreme Court Brief)
Adam Feldman, the creator of Empirical SCOTUS, had a narrower focus than Epstein-Gulati. Instead of...
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 6, 2022

Scalia’s Legacy Lives on in Supreme Court’s Abortion, Gun Cases

Bloomberg
The seeds of the US Supreme Court’s recent rulings on guns and abortion lie in...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Greg Stohr
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2022

How the Supreme Court’s “fauxriginalists” are warping the Constitution

Salon
...The truth is that so-called modern originalists or textualists, like the late Justice Antonin Scalia...
By: Praveen Fernandes, By Kirk Swearingen
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche