The Shield of National Protection: The Text & History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment | Constitutional Accountability Center

Text and History Narratives

The Shield of National Protection: The Text & History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment

The Shield tells how the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment gave Congress the lead role in enforcing the Constitution’s new guarantees of liberty and equality, only to have this explicit grant of power decimated by a hostile Supreme Court. The modern Supreme Court has made matters even worse, treating these older cases as super-precedents while inventing new restrictions on Congress’ ability to ensure state officials obey Fourteenth Amendment rights. The report argues that the Supreme Court should reconsider these errors, and restore the shield of national protection to its intended stature.

Summary

In June 2009, CAC released The Shield of National Protection: The Text and History of Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, the second in CAC’s Text and History Narrative Series and the follow-up to The Gem of the Constitution, our report on the Privileges or Immunities Clause.

The Shield tells how the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment gave Congress the lead role in enforcing the Constitution’s new guarantees of liberty and equality, only to have this explicit grant of power decimated by a hostile Supreme Court. The modern Supreme Court has made matters even worse, treating these older cases as super-precedents while inventing new restrictions on Congress’ ability to ensure state officials obey Fourteenth Amendment rights. The report argues that the Supreme Court should reconsider these errors, and restore the shield of national protection to its intended stature.

The Shield of National Protection

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen

CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...

Civil and Human Rights

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.

Civil and Human Rights

Ruling Away From America’s Second Founding

CAC’s David H. Gans wrote about the Roberts Court for Slate magazine. Read more in Slate.

By: David H. Gans

Civil and Human Rights

Furthering Inclusive Constitutionalism

Professor Allison Brownell Tirres reviewed recent scholarship on the Black Conventions of Reconstruction by CAC’s David H....

Civil and Human Rights

CAC Release: Roberts Court’s Conservative Supermajority Hollows Out Equal Protection Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Little v. Hecox and West Virginia...

By: David H. Gans, Praveen Fernandes, Joshua Blecher-Cohen

Civil and Human Rights

U.S. Supreme Court

Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC

In Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Constitution permits the Department of Labor to use administrative proceedings to impose civil monetary penalties on employers who violate...