Immigration and Citizenship

Arizona’s S.B. 1070 v. The Founders: CAC Files Brief in Historic Arizona Immigration Law Case

 

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Arizona is picking a fight with our Nation’s Founders, such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who made it absolutely clear that the federal government has the exclusive power to regulate immigration and naturalization.”

http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/us-v-arizona/9th-circuit-amicus-brief-us-v-az

Jan Brewer and other Arizona politicians like to portray the fight over the state’s immigration law as a fight with the Obama Administration,” said Doug Kendall, President of Constitutional Accountability Center, “but the fight Arizona is picking is with our Nation’s Founders, such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, who made it absolutely clear that the federal government has the exclusive power to regulate immigration and naturalization.”

In fact, as CAC’s brief explains, Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers, No. 32, that the Naturalization Clause of Article 1, Section 8, “which declares that Congress shall have power ‘to establish an UNIFORM rule of naturalization throughout the United States.’  . . . must necessarily be exclusive; because if each state had power to prescribe a DISTINCT RULE, there could not be a UNIFORM RULE.” (Emphasis in original.)  Arizona’s immigration law is plainly inconsistent not only with the views of Hamilton and other Founders, but also with the changes made to the Constitution after the Civil War to guarantee national citizenship.  The Founders’ vision was reinforced by the ratification of the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which established birthright citizenship and gave Congress exclusive authority over decisions to admit foreigners to national and state citizenship. 

 “Anti-immigration groups and politicians such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Sarah Palin forget what our Constitution’s Framers clearly knew: we are a country of immigrants,” said CAC’s Chief Counsel, Elizabeth Wydra.  “In attacking the right of citizenship at birth for children of undocumented immigrants and the balance struck in federal immigration statutes, they chip away at a critical part of the Nation’s DNA: the idea that in America, everyone deserves fair and humane treatment.”

#

Resources:

Constitutional Accountability Center’s Brief in United States v. Arizona: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/us-v-arizona/9th-circuit-amicus-brief-us-v-az

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

David Gans at Slate on the Upcoming Watson Case at SCOTUS and Absentee Voting During the Civil War

Election Law Blog
David H. Gan's article in Slate was featured in the Election Law Blog. Read an...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Smith v. Kind

In Smith v. Kind, the Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether qualified immunity protects prison guards from being held accountable for constitutional violations after they confined an incarcerated person in a cell without...