Immigration and Citizenship

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt below:

On April 1, the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Trump v. Barbara, a class-action lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for certain people. No one will be surprised to hear lawyers discussing the text of the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause and the history that led to its ratification—that clearly relates to the Trump administration’s claim that birthright citizenship doesn’t apply to children of “undocumented” or “temporarily present” noncitizens because their parents cannot establish “domicile,” meaning permanent presence in the country. But court watchers may not expect to hear debate about an 1844 inheritance case from New York. Yet that case, Lynch v. Clarke, has become incredibly important. Indeed, it may be instrumental in determining the fate of millions of American-born infants.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
November 10, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Set to Clarify Public-Rights Doctrine as it Applies to Employers who Benefit from Immigrant Labor

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Department of...
By: Joshua Blecher-Cohen, Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
October 23, 2026

Appeals Court Backs Trump on Constitutionality of Detentions

The New York Times
The Fifth Circuit’s opinion upholding immigrant detention without due process was “a sadly predictable result”...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Montoya Palacios v. Liggins

In Montoya Palacios v. Liggins, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Equal Access to Justice Act authorizes the award of legal fees to unlawfully detained immigrants who prevail in habeas proceedings.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Morozov v. Field Office Director, U.S. ICE

In Morozov v. Field Office Director, U.S. ICE, the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Lugo-Solet v. Mullin

In Lugot-Solet v. Mullin, the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
June 30, 2026

Domicile Isn’t a Real Argument for Citizenship Says Wydra

Bloomberg Podcasts
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra joined Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling on...