Civil and Human Rights

Victory Against Cash Bail in Conservative Circuit Court of Appeals

WASHINGTON—In a unanimous opinion this afternoon in ODonnell v. Harris, written by George W. Bush-appointed Judge Edith Brown Clement, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit largely upheld a lower court ruling that struck down the system of cash bail used in Harris County, Texas. Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amicus brief in support of ODonnell, and CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans issued the following reaction to this news: 

This is a huge, precedent-setting ruling that holds that state and local governments may not use the bail system to impose pretrial detention across-the-board on those too poor to pay. It speaks volumes that Judge Clement, a staunchly conservative jurist, found the Constitution’s promise of equal justice applies both to the rich and to the poor. Clement found that the policy presented a “basic injustice” forbidden by the Fourteenth Amendment: Those too poor to pay “sustain an absolute deprivation of their liberty interests,” while wealthy defendants, similar in all other respects, go free. With a host of similar cases pending in other courts, Clement’s analysis offers a powerful basis for ensuring equal justice for all, regardless of wealth.

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief in ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, et al. https://www.theusconstitution.org/cases/odonnell-v-harris-county-texas-et-al-5th-cir

“When cash bail violates the Constitution,” Elizabeth Wydra, San Antonio Express-News, October 10, 2017: https://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/When-cash-bail-violates-the-Constitution-12267460.php

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...