Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center
Corporate Accountability

RELEASE: In Latest Ruling, Conservative Justices Push Supreme Court’s Pro-Corporate Tilt Even Further

David Gans: “Today’s ruling is further proof that the Roberts Court is the most pro-corporate Court of the modern era.”

WASHINGTON—On news that the U.S. Supreme Court this morning issued its ruling in Jesner, et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC, Constitutional Accountability Center, which filed a brief in the case in support of Jesner, issued the following reaction from CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans:

Today’s ruling is further proof that the Roberts Court is the most pro-corporate Court of the modern era. In yet another 5-4 ruling that bends the law to favor corporations, the Supreme Court held that corporations can never be sued under the Alien Tort Statute, rewriting the statute to allow corporations to commit human rights abuses with impunity. There is real irony in today’s decision. In recent years, as Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent noted, in cases such as Citizens United and Hobby Lobby, the Roberts Court has rewritten the Constitution and federal laws to give corporations the same rights as individuals. Today’s ruling gives corporations greater rights than individuals and makes it impossible to hold corporations accountable when they violate basic human rights norms.

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief in Jesner, et al. v. Arab Bank, PLC: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/jesner-et-al-v-arab-bank-plc/

“Corporate Clout: As The Roberts Court Transforms, The Chamber Has Another Big Term,” July 26, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/corporate-clout/

“The Supreme Court’s New Term,” David Gans (discussing Jesner), September 29, 2017: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/the-supreme-courts-new-term/

“The Roberts Court Thinks Corporations Have More Rights Than You Do,” David Gans, The New Republic, June 30, 2014: https://newrepublic.com/article/118493/john-roberts-first-amendment-revolution-corporations

“A Capitalist Joker: The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past and Uncertain Future of Corporate Personhood in American Law,” CAC Text & History Narrative, March 20, 2010: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/a-capitalist-joker-corporations-corporate-personhood-and-the-constitution/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Corporate Accountability
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission

In Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T and Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission, the Supreme Court is considering whether the FCC’s two-stage civil-enforcement process violates the Seventh Amendment.
Corporate Accountability
January 15, 2026

January Newsletter: CAC Keeps Up the Fight for Corporate Accountability
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

In Millennia Housing Management v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is considering a challenge to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s authority to...
Corporate Accountability
July 2, 2025

Moneyed Interests Still Prevail at the Supreme Court (2024-2025 Term)

The Court Continues to Favor Corporations over Workers, Consumers, and the Environment.
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ana Builes
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Novartis v. Secretary United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional...
Corporate Accountability
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Boehringer Ingelheim v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considered whether the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug price negotiation program is an unconstitutional taking...