Rule of Law

Judge says emoluments suit against Trump can proceed

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled that 200 congressional Democrats can sue President Donald Trump for benefiting from doing business with foreign governments, a violation of the emoluments clause of the Constitution.

District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan of the District of Columbia, said the lawmakers have a legal standing to proceed with the lawsuit in a Friday ruling. The plaintiffs — led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. — argue that Trump is violating the Constitution’s emoluments clause by earning profits from the Trump International Hotel.

The emoluments clause of the Constitution says no person holding office may, without the consent of Congress, accept a present of any kind from a foreign state. Watchdogs insist that Trump is violating the Constitution whenever his hotels or golf courses receive a payment from a foreign government.

Sullivan said that if the allegations made by Democratic lawmakers are true, “the President is accepting prohibited foreign emoluments without asking and without receiving a favorable reply from Congress,” a violation of the Constitution. He said the plaintiffs showed enough evidence to proceed with the case.

Blumenthal called the ruling “a real milestone.”

The Constitutional Accountability Center, which represented the Democratic lawmakers in the case, called it a “major victory.”

“This is a momentous ruling. Judge Sullivan correctly reviewed the Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit case law in this area, and concluded that President Trump harms members of Congress by accepting benefits from foreign governments without first obtaining their affirmative consent,” the organization said.

“By recognizing that members of Congress have standing to sue, the court proved to all in America today that no one is above the law, not even the president.”

The Justice Department said it expects the case to be dismissed.

Sullivan is the second judge to allow an emoluments case against Trump. In March, District Court Judge Peter Messitte of Maryland approved a similar lawsuit.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
June 29, 2026

The Supreme Court is ‘Unquestionably an Ideological Court’ Says Wydra

Bloomberg TV
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra joined Bloomberg's Balance of Power to discuss the end of the...