Rule of Law

Democrats can sue Trump over payments

A US judge has ruled that congressional Democrats are able to sue President Donald Trump over claims he’s violated a ban on accepting foreign payments.

A US federal court has refused to immediately dismiss a lawsuit accusing President Donald Trump of violating a constitutional anti-corruption provision by accepting foreign payments through his hotels and businesses without the permission of Congress.

US District Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington says in a 58-page ruling that lawmakers who brought the suit have legal standing to sue the president for allegedly flouting the US constitution’s “emoluments” clause, which prevents federal office holders accepting presents and other benefits from foreign governments without the “consent” of Congress.

The lawsuit, filed in June 2017, is the third constitutional challenge to Trump’s business interests while in office but it is notable because the plaintiffs are themselves members of Congress.

The 198 members involved in the suit are all Democrats but also include Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.

The constitutional provision at issue is designed to prevent corruption and foreign influence.

Sullivan says in his ruling the provision gives each member of Congress the right to vote before the president accepts a prohibited foreign emolument.

“Accordingly, plaintiffs adequately allege that the president has completely nullified their votes,” Sullivan says.

“By recognising that members of Congress have standing to sue, the court proved to all in America today that no one is above the law, not even the president,” said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a legal organisation representing the lawmakers.

Department of Justice spokeswoman Kelly Laco said the government “will continue to defend the president in court”.

Trump, a wealthy real estate developer who as president regularly visits his own hotels, resorts and golf clubs, maintains ownership of his businesses but has ceded day-to-day control to his sons.

Critics have said that is not a sufficient safeguard.

Though Sullivan says the legislators are entitled to sue, he has yet to rule on whether the profits Trump earns from foreign governments are actually prohibited.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
June 29, 2026

The Supreme Court is ‘Unquestionably an Ideological Court’ Says Wydra

Bloomberg TV
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra joined Bloomberg's Balance of Power to discuss the end of the...