Nearly 200 congressional Democrats sue Donald Trump over the emoluments clause

By Emily Singer

A massive group of congressional Democrats plans to file a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, alleging he’s in violation of the Constitution for keeping his stake in his foreign businesses, the Washington Post reported.

The lawsuit — filed by 196 Democratic members of Congress — says Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause, which bans lawmakers from accepting “any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state” without the consent of Congress.

The lawmakers are seeking to stop Trump from “accepting any benefits from foreign states without first obtaining congressional consent,” according to the text of the lawsuit obtained by the Washington Post.

The lawsuit comes days after the attorneys general from Maryland and Washington, D.C., also filed suit against Trump, alleging he’s in violation of anticorruption clauses in the Constitution.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has taken the lead on the lawsuit, with Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) leading the effort in the House. No Republicans have joined the lawsuit, but Blumenthal told the Washington Post that they are invited to.

The White House has not yet responded to the lawsuit.

But White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the suit filed by the Maryland and D.C. attorneys general was about “partisan politics.”

“I think the president’s interest, as previously discussed, do not violate the emoluments clause,” Spicer said in his June 12 press briefing.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...