Criminal Law
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Case Summary
On January 26, 2009 the Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of the prosecutors in Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, a case that addressed whether prosecutors have absolute immunity from liability for failing to provide criminal defendants with constitutionally-required exculpatory information. Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed an amicus brief in this case in support of the respondent, Thomas Lee Goldstein, who spent 24 years in prison after he was wrongfully convicted of murder based on the false testimony of a self-interested jailhouse informant.
Case Timeline
-
September 5, 2008
CAC files a merits stage amicus brief in the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Merits Stage Amicus Brief
More from Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court
Chatrie v. United States
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether “geofence warrants” violate the Fourth Amendment.
U.S. Supreme Court
Pitchford v. Cain
In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
January 22, 2026
Supreme Court broadens police authority for warrantless home entry
The Case v. Montana decision replaces the Fourth Amendment’s “probable cause” requirement with “objective reasonableness”...
January 20, 2026
CAC Release: Justices Unanimously Conclude that Restitution Under the MVRA Is a Criminal Penalty
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Ellingburg v. United States,...
January 14, 2026
Supreme Court Backs Police Entry Without Warrant in Emergencies
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said law enforcement officials had flexibility to enter a home...
January 14, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court Ignores History in Favor of Its Own Rule for Warrantless Home Entries
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Case v. Montana, a...