President Washington Would Have Squashed Rick Barber Like a Grape

by Doug Kendall, President & Founder, and Hannah McCrea, Online Communications Director, Constitutional Accountability Center

The efforts of Tea Partiers to wrap their anti-government agenda within the imagery of our Nation’s Founding reached absurd and dangerous heights this morning with the release of Alabama congressional candidate Rick Barber’s “Gather Your Armies” campaign ad, which portrays a George Washington-like figure authorizing armed rebellion in response to federal taxation and a law passed through the process established by the Founders (the health care bill).  Barber himself is heard in the ad stating that he would “impeach him,” apparently referring to President Obama, and then adds, ominously, “and if that’s not enough . . .”

Watch it yourself:

Allow us to clear up a few things.  First, as every fifth grader knows, our Founding Fathers rebelled against the British tea taxes primarily because the taxes were imposed upon the colonies without any representation in the British Parliament.  That’s why the call that resonated from the Founding was “taxation without representation” — not simply “no taxation.”   In fact, the Constitution was written, among other reasons, to “promote the general Welfare,” and it authorizes Congress to “lay and collect taxes” for that very purpose.

Second, Barber’s ad invokes patriots such as George Washington apparently to support a proposition that Washington would surely have found abhorrent:  that citizens should engage in armed rebellion in response to government actions sanctioned by our Constitution.   In fact, we know precisely how President Washington would have responded if the armed rebellion suggested by Barber materialized: he would have crushed it.  We know this because just such a rebellion – the Whiskey Rebellion – happened during Washington’s presidency.

Like Barber and his tea party friends, the whiskey rebels of the late 17th Century believed the federal government had overreached and had unfairly imposed taxes upon them.  As recounted in Ron Chernow’s brilliant biography of Alexander Hamilton, President Washington – surely the greatest patriot this country has known – determined this rebellion must be crushed, stating that if “a minority is to dictate to the majority, there is an end put at one stroke to republican government.”  (p. 473) Then the 62-year old Father of our Country joined Alexander Hamilton and the federal army on a westward journey that put the rebellion to rest.

President Washington would have “gathered the armies” if Barber made good on his veiled threats, not in support of, but in opposition to, Barber’s objectives.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...