Access to Justice
The Future of Access to Courts
CAC hosted a panel discussion at Georgetown Law School’s Supreme Court Institute to explore how the Roberts Court has made it harder for Americans to get their day in court, and to mark the release of its latest Text & History narrative, The Keystone of the Arch: The Text & History of Article III and the Constitution’s Promise of Access to the Courts.
More from Access to Justice
March 4, 2026
CAC Release: Unanimous Supreme Court Rejects State-Affiliated Corporation’s Claim of Immunity from Suit
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Galette v. New Jersey...
February 25, 2026
CAC Release: In Disappointing Sixth Amendment Decision, the Supreme Court Made Clear the Limits of Its Decision
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Villarreal v. Texas, a...
February 12, 2026
February Newsletter: CAC Supports Everyday Americans Fighting for Their Day in Court
At every level of our judicial system, a complex set of doctrines determines what cases...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas
In United States ex rel. Taylor v. Healthcare Associates of Texas, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act violate Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
U.S. Supreme Court
Flowers Foods v. Brock
In Flowers Foods v. Brock, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Federal Arbitration Act exempts from arbitration “last-mile” delivery drivers who transport goods between two points in the same state to their final destinations,...
U.S. Supreme Court
T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System
In T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine requires dismissal of a request for relief from a state-court decision that did not reach the state’s highest...