Corporate Accountability

Anti-Citizens United Amendment Ballot Measure Gets Favorable Hearing

Washington, DC – In August of last year, the California Supreme Court issued a temporary stay, which removed from the 2014 state ballot a measure known as Proposition 49, which calls for an advisory vote by Californians on a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. FEC and give the people the power to regulate money in politics. Ruling by a vote of 5-1, the court ordered full briefing of the case on the merits, with Justice Goodwin Liu writing a lengthy concurring opinion setting out his views about why this measure did not belong on the ballot. A year later, after extensive briefing, the Justices today heard oral argument.    

 

“Today’s oral argument sounded like a sharp turnaround from the temporary ruling that removed Proposition 49 from the ballot a year ago last August,” CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans observed. “Many of the Justices—including Justice Liu—recognized that the state legislature has a special role in the federal amendment process. Under our constitutional system, the legislature has clear authority to seek the input of the people in deciding whether to call for an amendment to our nation’s charter. The people of the state of California should not be denied the opportunity to show their support for overturning rulings, such as Citizens United, that pervert the Constitution and harm our democracy.” 

 

CAC Counsel Tom Donnelly continued, “Americans remain deeply concerned about the corrupting influence of money in politics, Californians included. Proposition 49 simply gives them a say in finding a solution.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. Padilla: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/howard-jarvis-taxpayers-association-v-padilla-cal-sup-ct 

 

“Money in Politics in California: Let the Voters Have Their Say,” Tom Donnelly, Huffington Post, October 5, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-donnelly/money-in-politics-in-cali_b_8246232.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Corporate Accountability

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...