Rule of Law

RELEASE: Critically Important Conversation Advances on Potential Responses to Dangerous Immunity Decision

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s announcement of new proposals to respond to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

 

Last month, in Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority created a measure of immunity from criminal prosecution for acts committed by a former president. This vision of presidential immunity is wholly unsupported by the text and history of the Constitution, and poses grave dangers to our democracy and the foundational principle that no one is above the law. The ongoing conversation prompted by the proposals and statements from national leaders, including President Joe Biden, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Congressman Joe Morelle, is an important part of the national response to those dangers, as well as a powerful reminder that it is not only the courts, but also Congress and We The People, who shape constitutional meaning. As this important and laudable conversation continues, one thing remains clear—our nation cannot afford to turn its presidents into kings. The Constitution’s framers understandably feared unchecked monarchical power, and Americans rightly fear it today. The American people deserve better.

 

##

Resources:

Case page in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/

Release in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-high-courts-decision-on-presidential-immunity-is-too-little-and-too-late-to-ensure-the-framers-vision-of-presidential-accountability/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 30, 2026

13th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court

Host: Constitutional Accountability Center
This year’s Home Stretch at the Supreme Court panel discussion will be moderated by Law...
Participants: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Brianne J. Gorod, Easha Anand, Jennifer Bennett, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Chris Geidner, Melissa Murray
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

Supreme Court not fully sold on foreclosure fairness bid

Courthouse News Service
A showdown over tax foreclosures had the justices considering the striking set of facts that...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Oral Argument Focuses on Takings Clause, While Largely Ignoring the Problematic Excessive-Fines-Clause Analysis Applied by the Court Below

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pung v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
February 24, 2026

50+ Organizations Condemn Federal Authorities for Blocking Minnesota’s Independent Investigation into CBP Killing of Alex Pretti

WASHINGTON, DC — Today marks one month since the killing of Alex Pretti on January...
Rule of Law
February 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Rejects President Trump’s Claim of Unilateral Tariff Authority

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Learning Resources v. Trump and Trump...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.