Rule of Law

RELEASE: Critically Important Conversation Advances on Potential Responses to Dangerous Immunity Decision

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s announcement of new proposals to respond to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

 

Last month, in Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority created a measure of immunity from criminal prosecution for acts committed by a former president. This vision of presidential immunity is wholly unsupported by the text and history of the Constitution, and poses grave dangers to our democracy and the foundational principle that no one is above the law. The ongoing conversation prompted by the proposals and statements from national leaders, including President Joe Biden, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Congressman Joe Morelle, is an important part of the national response to those dangers, as well as a powerful reminder that it is not only the courts, but also Congress and We The People, who shape constitutional meaning. As this important and laudable conversation continues, one thing remains clear—our nation cannot afford to turn its presidents into kings. The Constitution’s framers understandably feared unchecked monarchical power, and Americans rightly fear it today. The American people deserve better.

 

##

Resources:

Case page in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/

Release in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-high-courts-decision-on-presidential-immunity-is-too-little-and-too-late-to-ensure-the-framers-vision-of-presidential-accountability/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
August 8, 2026

Now Its Your Turn

Amicus
David. H. Gans’ June 2026 appearance on the Amicus podcast was cited in a later episode...
Rule of Law
August 3, 2026

Reflections on My Fellowship

My fellowship experience at CAC has been deeply rewarding. Over the course of the fellowship,...
Rule of Law
July 30, 2026

Trump’s new Truth Social plan: pay $100K

NPR
Elizabeth Wydra joined the NPR podcast “The Indicator from Planet Money” to discuss potential corruption...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...