Rule of Law

RELEASE: Critically Important Conversation Advances on Potential Responses to Dangerous Immunity Decision

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s announcement of new proposals to respond to the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following reaction:

 

Last month, in Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority created a measure of immunity from criminal prosecution for acts committed by a former president. This vision of presidential immunity is wholly unsupported by the text and history of the Constitution, and poses grave dangers to our democracy and the foundational principle that no one is above the law. The ongoing conversation prompted by the proposals and statements from national leaders, including President Joe Biden, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Congressman Joe Morelle, is an important part of the national response to those dangers, as well as a powerful reminder that it is not only the courts, but also Congress and We The People, who shape constitutional meaning. As this important and laudable conversation continues, one thing remains clear—our nation cannot afford to turn its presidents into kings. The Constitution’s framers understandably feared unchecked monarchical power, and Americans rightly fear it today. The American people deserve better.

 

##

Resources:

Case page in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/trump-v-united-states/

Release in Trump v. United States: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-high-courts-decision-on-presidential-immunity-is-too-little-and-too-late-to-ensure-the-framers-vision-of-presidential-accountability/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer

In American Center for International Labor Solidarity v. Chavez-Deremer, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to terminate en masse all of the Department...
Rule of Law
April 28, 2025

Trump’s first 100 days offer blueprint for future presidents to evade Congress

Roll Call
ANALYSIS — As he marks the first 100 days of his second term, President Donald...
Rule of Law
May 1, 2025

Bondi’s Firing of DOJ Lawyer for Lack of ‘Zealous Advocacy’ in Deportation Case Raises Concerns

Law.com
A leading legal ethics scholar warned that the U.S. attorney general’s action may “intimidate DOJ...