Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Members of Congress in Census Court Challenge: Constitution Demands Count of All Persons, Regardless of Citizenship

“Our Constitution directs the government to count all persons every ten years in the Census. Article I together with the Fourteenth Amendment require this.”

WASHINGTON—Constitutional Accountability Center today is filing a brief in federal court on behalf of a bipartisan group of more than 100 current and former Members of Congress in support of the State of New York and the other plaintiffs in New York, et al. v. U.S. Department of Commerce, et al., a case challenging the Trump Administration’s wrongful insertion of a citizenship question into the 2020 Census.

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra said, “Our Constitution directs the government to count all persons every ten years in the Census. Article I together with the Fourteenth Amendment require this. Injecting an untested and unjustified citizenship question into the 2020 Census at the 11th hour before the counting begins—as the Trump Administration is attempting to do here over the advice of career Census officials—would be an end-run around the constitutional duty to count all persons. In addition to flouting the text, history and values of our founding charter, such a question would be incredibly damaging. It would undermine our democracy and shortchange already undercounted communities and leave them without the federal dollars needed for infrastructure, schools, and other critical services.”

Led by U.S. Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), co-chair of the House Census Caucus, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI), today’s brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of more than 100 current and former Members of Congress also demolishes the government’s main justification for pushing a citizenship question into the 2020 Census, so-called enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. As the brief explains:

A citizenship question has never been viewed as necessary to ensure robust protection of the right to vote free from racial discrimination. Indeed, since the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, the Census has never asked all persons to report their citizenship status. This is a specious justification for undercutting what the Constitution mandates: a count of all the people, regardless of their citizenship status.

Read the whole brief here.

#

Resources:

CAC amicus brief on behalf of bipartisan current and former Members of Congress in New York v. Department of Commerce: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/NY-v-Dept-of-Commerce-Brief-FINAL.pdf

Letter of Constitution, Civil Rights and Democracy Organizations to Secretary Ross: Reject Mandatory Citizenship Question on 2020 Census, March 22, 2018: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-constitution-civil-rights-democracy-organizations-secretary-ross-reject-mandatory-citizenship-question-2020-census/

CAC Issue Brief: The Cornerstone of Our Democracy: The Census Clause and the Constitutional Obligation to Count All Persons, David H. Gans, March 19, 2018: https://www.theusconstitution.org/think_tank/cornerstone-democracy-census-clause-constitutional-obligation-count-persons/

“Count all the people, just as the Constitution says,” San Antonio Express-News, David H. Gans, March 9, 2018: https://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/commentary/article/Count-all-the-people-just-as-the-Constitution-12742298.php

CAC Letter to Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce: Census Citizenship Question “Threatens to Undermine Your Constitutional Duty,” February 15, 2018: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-letter-secretary-ross-census-citizenship-question-threatens-undermine-constitutional-duty/

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.
Immigration and Citizenship
November 20, 2025

Trump’s fight to redefine ‘American citizen’ returns to Supreme Court

Courthouse News Service
After winning round one, President Trump wants the justices to tee up a final showdown...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

RAICES v. Noem

In RAICES v. Noem, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people within the country from seeking asylum. 
Immigration and Citizenship
June 30, 2025

CAC Release: At the Fifth Circuit, the Government Argued that Alien Enemies Act Means Whatever the President Says. Its Drafters Couldn’t Have Agreed Less.

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
By: Smita Ghosh, Ana Builes
Immigration and Citizenship
June 27, 2025

Trump’s Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Is Unlawful Because Tren de Aragua Is Not a Foreign Nation or Government

Since President Donald Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act three months ago to send hundreds...
By: Ana Builes
Immigration and Citizenship
June 27, 2025

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on the Scope of Injunctions Fails to Acknowledge the Importance of the Constitution’s Birthright Citizenship Guarantee

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Trump v. CASA, Trump...