Civil and Human Rights

Supreme Court Review Puts Voting Rights Act In Jeopardy After Election Proves Its Necessity

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court decided to take up the case of Shelby County v. Holder this afternoon, Constitutional Accountability Center President Doug Kendall issued the following statement: 

 

“In the wake of an election season in which the Voting Rights Act proved its mettle as the last, best hope against voter suppression efforts, the Supreme Court today decided to review the constitutionality of this iconic civil rights statute.  If the experience over the last 12 months proves anything, it’s that the Voting Rights Act is as vital today as it was in 1965 when originally passed. Hopefully, the proven success of the Act and the powerful opinions written by lower court judges from across the ideological spectrum applying it will convince a majority on the Court to affirm rather than undermine the vital constitutionality of the Act.” 

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Constitutional Accountability Center case page, including our briefs, in Shelby County v. Holder: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/shelby-county-v-holder 

 

“The Surprisingly Easy Case for the Constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act,” David Gans, September 24, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1623/surprisingly-easy-case-constitutionality-voting-rights-act

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

### 

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...