Text and History Narratives

“We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing

Summary

Both Supreme Court doctrine and the scholarly literature on the constitutional constraints on policing generally begin and end with the Fourth Amendment, ignoring the Fourteenth Amendment’s transformative guarantees designed to curtail police abuses and safeguard liberty, personal security, and equality for all regardless of race. This Article corrects this omission by providing the first comprehensive account of the text, history, and original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment’s limitations on policing. It shows how the Fourteenth Amendment changed our understanding of the constitutional guarantee of the right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures and added to our foundational charter a prohibition on all forms of discriminatory policing.

Read the full text of We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing below.

Race, Policing, and the Constitution Video Series

“Race, Policing, and the Constitution” is a three-part video series produced by the Constitutional Accountability Center to highlight the constitutional history behind the 4th and 14th Amendments, explicitly including efforts to protect Black Americans from police abuse and violence. 

Inspired by CAC’s latest scholarship, We Do Not Want to be Hunted”: The Right To Be Secure and Our Constitutional Story of Race and Policing, this video series unpacks discriminatory policing and sets the stage for constitutional remedies.

The series features voices from CAC President Elizabeth Wydra and Civil Rights Director David Gans, Raben Group Principal and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs at the Department of Justice Elliot Williams, and Justice Reform Program Director at The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sakira Cook.

More from Criminal Law

Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pitchford v. Cain

In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
Criminal Law
January 22, 2026

Supreme Court broadens police authority for warrantless home entry

Smart Cities Dive
The Case v. Montana decision replaces the Fourth Amendment’s “probable cause” requirement with “objective reasonableness”...
Criminal Law
January 20, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Unanimously Conclude that Restitution Under the MVRA Is a Criminal Penalty

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Ellingburg v. United States,...
By: Smita Ghosh
Criminal Law
January 14, 2026

Supreme Court Backs Police Entry Without Warrant in Emergencies

The New York Times
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said law enforcement officials had flexibility to enter a home...
Criminal Law
January 14, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Ignores History in Favor of Its Own Rule for Warrantless Home Entries

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Case v. Montana, a...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Criminal Law
November 11, 2025

Supreme Court to hear compassionate release case

Gray TV Washington News Bureau
[video width="1028" height="576" mp4="https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Recording-2025-11-17-090534.mp4"][/video] WASHINGTON (Gray DC) - The Supreme Court is set to hear...