Civil and Human Rights

Victory: Abortion Clinic Shutdown Laws Struck Down

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt – striking down Texas’ abortion clinic shutdown laws as unconstitutional – Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

 

“Justice Breyer’s majority opinion powerfully demonstrates the true purpose and onerous burden that laws like these in Texas would have placed on the right of women to access abortion – a liberty protected by the Constitution and the Court’s precedents. In setting aside such clinic shutdown laws, Breyer correctly wrote for the Court, ‘[T]he challenged provisions close most of the abortion facilities in Texas’ and  ‘vastly increase the obstacles confronting women seeking abortions in Texas without providing any benefit to women’s health capable of withstanding any meaningful scrutiny.’  

 

“It is also interesting to note” Wydra continued, “as we anticipated in our brief, that Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg found common ground in joining today’s majority opinion. As the Court’s leading thinkers on issues of access to abortion services, their approach to questions of individual liberty and equality clearly weighed heavily against regulations like the Texas laws struck down today.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/whole-woman%E2%80%99s-health-v-hellerstedt-us-sup-ct 

 

“The Supreme Court’s Choice on Abortion,” David H. Gans, The New Republic, March 2, 2016: https://newrepublic.com/article/131009/supreme-courts-choice-abortion 

 

“Faulty Federalism, Texas Edition: How Texas Hopes to Gut the Right to Abortion,” David H. Gans, Balkinization, February 29, 2016: http://balkin.blogspot.com/2016/02/faulty-federalism-texas-edition-how.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

“Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting”

Election Law Blog
CAC Senior Research Associate Lucy Resar‘s research on the history of absentee voting was featured on Election Law Blog....
By: Lucy Resar
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 19, 2026

Myths Around Election Day Deadlines: What the Civil War Teaches Us About Absentee Voting

Over the past two decades, the Supreme Court has steadily eroded access to the ballot....
By: Lucy Resar
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen’s The Attitude podcast

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
David H. Gans joined Arnie Arnesen's The Attitude podcast to discuss his recent article in Slate magazine about...
By: David H. Gans, Arnie Arnsen
Civil and Human Rights
March 18, 2026

Gans on Black Conventions and the Reconstruction Amendments

Legal Theory Blog
The Legal Theory Blog recommended David H. Gans’s exciting new scholarship on Reconstruction-era Black Conventions. Read an...
Immigration and Citizenship
March 18, 2026

The Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Decision Hinges on a Case You’ve Never Heard Of

Slate
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh wrote about the history of birthright citizenship in Slate magazine. Read an excerpt...
By: Smita Ghosh
Voting Rights and Democracy
March 13, 2026

Trump’s Voting Nemesis Is at the Supreme Court. We Can’t Afford for SCOTUS to Get It Wrong.

Slate
CAC's David H. Gans wrote an article in Slate about Watson v. RNC. Read an excerpt below:...