Immigration and Citizenship

American Samoans ask for automatic U.S. citizenship

By David Ingram

WASHINGTON | Thu Jul 12, 2012

(Reuters) – Eight natives of American Samoa filed a lawsuit on Tuesday in an attempt to win U.S. citizenship rights, which despite the name of the South Pacific territory, they do not receive at birth.

The lawsuit asks a federal court in Washington to declare that American Samoans are citizens of the United States, a status that would make them eligible for full U.S. passports and rights such as the right to vote while residing in a state.

American Samoa is unique as the only U.S. territory where those born there are not automatically U.S. citizens, the lawsuit said.

In the past century, Congress granted citizenship to the inhabitants of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, but not for American Samoa, an archipelago in the Pacific that the United States first claimed in 1900.

American Samoans can claim citizenship if, at birth, they had a parent who was a citizen. They can also pursue U.S. naturalization, but the lawsuit says they should not need to go through that “lengthy, costly and burdensome” process.

As a result, many of American Samoa’s 55,500 inhabitants receive passports with an imprint describing them as non-citizen U.S. nationals.

The status violates a clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment declaring that “all persons born … in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” the lawsuit said.

Officials at the State Department, which issues passports, and the Justice Department, which defends the government in court, had no immediate comment on Wednesday.

Murad Hussain, a lawyer for the American Samoans, said he was not aware of any similar previous lawsuit.

The eight American Samoans in question, including three minor children, face hardships for being denied automatic citizenship, the lawsuit said.

It said they cannot vote. They were not eligible for certain government jobs or education subsidies. One living in Hawaii could not legally own a firearm, a right the state restricts to U.S. citizens.

One thought he was a U.S. citizen because he served in the Hawaii National Guard, where citizenship is a requirement, but while renewing his passport in 1999, the State Department told him he was not, the lawsuit said.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
June 30, 2026

Domicile Isn’t a Real Argument for Citizenship Says Wydra

Bloomberg Podcasts
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra joined Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling on...
Immigration and Citizenship
June 30, 2026

CAC Release: In Birthright Citizenship Victory, Dissenting Justices Cast Aside Constitutional Text and History

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, a...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC

In Buele Morocho v. Warden Philadelphia FDC, the Third Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega

In Sosnava Rodriguez v. Ortega, the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Due Process Clause allows the Trump administration to imprison all undocumented immigrants during deportation proceedings against them.
Immigration and Citizenship
April 1, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Skeptical of Administration’s Domicile-Driven Approach to Birthright Citizenship

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Smita Ghosh